« Google History, Meet Google Propaganda | Main | Your Call Is Important To Us »

The really scary thing about this story about restriction of press freedom and potentially illegal actions by postal security, is that it got so little media attention. Other than the Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press, no one seems to be picking this up.
Stephan Bachenheimer is a respected and accredited reporter. That should have been very simple for security to ascertain.
The "war on terrorism" excuse is getting rather tired. In Canada (where I live), taking a reporter's film or videotape is illegal in most situations. If actions like this are not given higher profile, I suspect we'll continue to hear more and more such tales.
Peter R. Snell

tioedong said:

Given the fact that postal workers died in a terrorist attack three years ago, refusing to let someone film a mail facility seems correct. Someone could be casing the place for terrorism, or as a common thief figuring the best way to steal welfare and pension checks...(something that alas happens in cities, which is why my pension check is "direct bank deposit).

The USPostOffice is federal government, and bomb threats are not unknown. The correct procedure for filming in a Federal Building has to be followed...you have to have proper press credentials, and before you filmed you need to ask permission from the postmaster...
Is that so hard?

According to the RCFP account, he was credentialed, but not expected. In the absence of a clear and present danger, concerns about terrorism don't give security personnel the excuse to trample basic liberties.